Old, interesting, previously thought of, solved, forgotten problems, but indeed inspiring problems.
- In fact, thinking with a "Japanese mindset," we can discover that this problem is equivalent to "what should life be like?" At this point, we can think of many things, but the immediate question that arises is: "Whose life is being asked about?"
- Yes, this is the most important question in this sentence, it lacks a precise definition of words. Upon reexamining this question, we can find that we cannot know what the definitions of [life] and [meaning] really are. We can say the former is [everyone's life] or [the life of the person looking at the problem].
- Consequently, we can also find that we simply do not know the meaning of the word [life], or can only point out some similar words, unable to accurately describe it as precisely as a mathematical definition. As for [meaning], it becomes even more unclear, what is [meaning]?
- Thus, we can see that this problem is confusing, or bluntly put, it strictly has no discussion value without determining its specific context.
- Very "scientific" thinking, but in fact, this is a linguistic issue, yet we can still draw a conclusion: "Discussing 'the meaning of life' is fundamentally meaningless."
- Well, congratulations, you have discovered the core contradiction of most philosophical propositions, none of them have specific definitions.
- So, coming back to the point, in this process of thinking, we may more or less have the feeling of "No, this is not the answer I want," because most of us should be asking, "What should my life be like?" rather than that meaningless question, or thinking divergently, "What should the lives of most people be like?"
- Oh no, you shouldn't ask me this question, I am just "another person" and not "myself," that is everyone's own question, but I am happy to provide you with a few possibly more painful, inspiring classic answers:
- Do you want to sacrifice your freedom of thought, your attention, and stop thinking for continuous happiness?
- Do you want to constantly think like an ascetic, facing the happiness brought by temporary wisdom, but gaining more pain and despair from knowledge?
- Is the expansion of experiential breadth more important or the increase in depth of thought more important? Emotion-oriented thinking and purposeful religious thinking, which one do you acknowledge more?
- When actions and opportunities conflict in expanding depth and breadth, which one will you choose?
- However, in any case, the core of this question still involves the idea that "you should choose for yourself," but this conceals the fact that the choices themselves will bring different costs and results, even if none of them are the best before you choose.
- Yes, it is a black box, a war full of fog, where everyone is their own commander and soldier, you do not know what you will get next, leaving you only with a countdown to decision-making and fear of [possibilities].
- You can only open your eyes wide, see everything you have, use your strategic thinking, rationality, and courage to decide everything.
2023.5.1 3:00 write in train
Damn it, how can that woman next to me be so uncivilized, daring to take off her shoes on the train, I've been smelling her stinky feet for eight hours, buying a seat ticket is really unlucky.